Absolutes
and Ethical Relativism in the Workplace
By Mark
S. Putnam |

|
Any ethical system, whether
it involves codes of conduct, company rules, or legalities, will fail if
the people who
are making and following it do not
adhere to an ethical code that is rooted in moral absolutes. But talking about "moral
absolutes" is a touchy subject, especially in a business context. Rather
than talk about it directly, we prefer a simple crime and punishment approach
to dealing with ethics. For the most part, this model gets the desired behavior
but it doesn't go below the surface to give employees the whys behind the issue.
Herein lies the problem. We need to face the reality of moral absolutes and
reject the ethical relativism that creeps in to undermine them.
This is controversial territory because we can't get past some basic philosophical
questions that block our path. Whose morals are absolute? Should someone
dictate morality? How can we accommodate the diversity of people at work?
Isn't morality
a personal, religious, or philosophical issue? Well in actuality, the workplace
is precisely where the discussion of moral absolutes should take place because
no arena needs it more desperately.
Imagine a world with ethical codes devoid of moral absolutes. What does that
leave you with? What remains, are only good intentions, hollow expectations,
and nice sounding ideas. The only thing that provides any semblance of order
is brute force. But, who wants to work in a place like that? A workplace
cannot be a police state nor can it be so permissive that it undermines
the success
of the company. It must maintain a balance between the ethical expectations
of the employer and the character of the individual. When both have their
ethical foundations built on absolute principles, they are in sync and
they will counter
the problem of ethical relativism.
Let's get to the point: moral absolutes are a reality that must be dealt
with. Ethical relativism undermines the whole thing and should be rejected.
Unfortunately,
for those who are afraid to delve into this area, there isn't much middle
ground to retreat to.
Let's start out with some definitions and examples. What is ethical relativism?
If you know what situational ethics is, you have seen ethical relativism
in action. It is the notion that there are no moral absolutes or no moral
rights
and wrongs. Instead, right and wrong are based on social norms - that is,
whatever our society or culture says is right or wrong. Ethical relativism
holds to
the notion that morals have evolved and changed over time, and therefore
are not absolute.
Now, one might wonder if moral relativism is all that bad? On the surface
we might be inclined to err on the relativistic side since we all have
different
ethical standards, perspectives, experiences, and feelings. It only seems
natural to allow freedom of choice and diversity to have their say. But,
a closer look
reveals that we humans are a lot more alike in this regard than we think.
Look around you and you'll see the evidence of this everywhere. Our diverse
society shares a surprising amount of common moral beliefs. No matter whom
you voted for for president, what religion you are, or your position in life,
your basic moral standards of right and wrong are much the same. These are
not "social norms" but moral absolutes. Stealing is wrong. Lying
is wrong. Honesty, patience, dependability, fairness, and responsibility
are right. You can take these moral absolutes to the bank. If you grab on
to them
and wrap yourself in them, you will be following a model of success that
has stood the test of time. When you focus like a laser beam on what is good
and
right and take out all the emotion and distraction, what remains are pure
moral absolutes that are universal to all humanity.
The challenge for us is to latch on to these moral absolutes in a busy, hectic,
morally-mushy business world. Think of the famous scene in the Green Bay
Packers locker room when coach Vince Lombardi held up a football and said, "Men,
this is a football." His point was that there is a time when we need
to focus to the basics. So, what is honesty? What is good? These are the
basics.
Shoot toward them, drive toward them, and strive with all your might to move
toward them. Moral absolutes are not your enemy. They must not be on the
bench but on the field, in uniform, and a part of your game plan for success.
In the long run, moral relativism doesn't really help you. When you're facing
a tough situation at work, grab on to the security of timeless moral absolutes.
It's a matter of getting back to basics, getting rid of the emotion and self-interest.
Be convinced that there are moral absolutes and close the door on ethical
relativism. Believe it or not, there is a place for this topic in the workplace.
It's been
there all along but we've been too busy to notice.
Look around you and you'll see the evidence of this everywhere. Our diverse
society shares a surprising amount of common moral beliefs. No matter whom
you voted for for president, what religion you are, or your position in life,
your basic moral standards of right and wrong are much the same. These are
not "social norms" but moral absolutes. Stealing is wrong. Lying
is wrong. Honesty, patience, dependability, fairness, and responsibility
are right. You can take these moral absolutes to the bank. If you grab on
to them
and wrap yourself in them, you will be following a model of success that
has stood the test of time. When you focus like a laser beam on what is good
and
right and take out all the emotion and distraction, what remains are pure
moral absolutes that are universal to all humanity.
The challenge for us is to latch on to these moral absolutes in a busy, hectic,
morally-mushy business world. Think of the famous scene in the Green Bay
Packers locker room when coach Vince Lombardi held up a football and said, "Men,
this is a football." His point was that there is a time when we need to
focus to the basics. So, what is honesty? What is good? Shoot toward it, drive
toward it, and strive with all your might to move toward it." Moral
absolutes are not your enemy. They must not be on the bench but on the field,
in uniform,
and a part of your game plan for success.
In the long run, moral relativism doesn't really help you. When you're facing
a tough situation at work, grab on to the security of timeless moral absolutes.
It's a matter of getting back to basics, getting rid of the emotion and self-interest.
Be convinced that there are moral absolutes and close the door on ethical
relativism. Believe it or not, there is a place for this topic in the workplace.
It's been
there all along but we've been too busy to notice.
©2005 CTI/GEU All Rights Reserved
|